Talk:Municipal solid waste

Sanitation Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sanitation, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sanitation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SanitationWikipedia:WikiProject SanitationTemplate:WikiProject Sanitationsanitation articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Start‑class High‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Properties of MSW was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 22 December 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Municipal solid waste. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Merge

Municipal solid waste is not distinct from the general term "waste" and I do not believe they should be merged.--Alex 07:53, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but see Talk:Waste. --Macrakis 12:34, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed Municipal Waste as a search would more likely be targeting the rock group of the same name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.179.180.79 (talk) 13:47, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Johan Vennik's recycling process

Appearantly, Johan Vennik developed a way to to process 96% of the domestic waste, without incorporating incineration. Vennik plans to set up a pilot factory in Breda (the Netherlands).^[1]

Perhaps mention in article KVDP (talk) 14:10, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ EOS magazine, april 2013

"Garbage"

The usage and primary topic of Garbage is under discussion, see talk:garbage (disambiguation) -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 04:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Municipal solid waste. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Bank of Waste" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bank of Waste. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 19:19, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Coulee Dam ?

I`m confused..why is this picture here ? The info box appears to be completely irrelevant 2600:1702:2340:9470:AC44:28A1:B377:F8E6 (talk) 23:13, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Indiana University supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] EOS magazine, april 2013

[1]