Talk:Mumbai Fire Brigade

India: Maharashtra / Mumbai Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Mumbai (assessed as High-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	This article was last assessed in November 2013.

Firefighting

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firefighting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to firefighting on Wikipedia! If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.FirefightingWikipedia:WikiProject FirefightingTemplate:WikiProject FirefightingFirefighting articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

I was going to add Info within some hours but it was delited Please Dont Delite this page --Suyogaerospace^{talk to me!} 17:25, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Largest?

The article says that the Mumbai Fire Brigade is the largest in India with 33 fire stations, but how is this possible when the Karnataka Fire and Emergency Services alone has 168 fire stations within it's jurisdiction? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:15, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The cited reference is contentious and seems unreliable. From the available sources, I can't say if Karnataka Fire and Emergency Services is the largest in India. But I can surely say that the Mumbai Fire Brigade is definitely not the largest. My two cents. Mspraveen (talk) 07:28, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns

A large amount of the content on this page is unsourced. There is no source for them, and it seems to be WP:OR. I think it needs to be removed. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:53, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Totally agreed. Some paragraphs are linked from dead links too. Seems to have too much OR. ƬheStrike Σagle ^sorties 13:51, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]