Talk:Multiple granularity locking

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Unclear. Misses the point. Needs immediate rewrite.

Comps (talk) 00:57, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The abbreviations are not defined. This is a glaring mistake and needs to be rewritten. JesseBikman (talk) 23:08, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SIX and intentional locks

The article would benefit from pointing out that despite the name, intentional "locks" are not really locks, but only a way to denote that a lock of the specified type is, or shortly will be, added somewhere in the hierarchy below. This change will allow the reader to more easily understand the compatibility table.

Additionally, "SIX" is mentioned without explanation. After we clear up the explanation of intentional "locks", we should also clarify that "SIX" means "shared lock and exclusive intentional (lock)" or whatever wording is more compatible with the improved explanation of intentional locks. Jasonnet (talk) 18:42, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]