Talk:Multi-component gas analyzer system

A fact from Multi-component gas analyzer system appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 December 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a multi-component gas analyzer system can allow for real-time forecasting of volcanic eruptions?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Multi-component gas analyzer system.

Wikipedia

Articles for creation Stub‑class

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article was accepted from this draft on 23 September 2016 by reviewer TonyBallioni (talk · contribs).

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Multi-component gas analyzer system is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Volcanoes Mid‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 August 2020 and 11 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Brynnams. Peer reviewers: Johnmichael0705, KRose4.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:16, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Evaluation

Newer refs should be added. Brynnams (talk) 17:06, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review Complete

Peer review done for this new article. Off to a great start and will help out a lot in helping people understand how volcanic gases are monitored and analyzed! --Johnmichael0705 (talk) 15:39, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that multi-component gas analyzer systems can allow for real-time forecasting of volcanic eruptions? Source: Aiuppa, Alessandro; Moretti, Roberto; Federico, Cinzia; Giudice, Gaetano; Gurrieri, Sergio; Liuzzo, Marco; Papale, Paolo; Shinohara, Hiroshi; Valenza, Mariano (2007). "Forecasting Etna eruptions by real-time observation of volcanic gas composition". Geology. 35 (12): 1115. Bibcode:2007Geo....35.1115A. doi:10.1130/G24149A.1
- ALT1:... that multi-component gas analyzer systems can help scientists monitor real-time changes in volcanic gases, allowing for more rapid hazard mitigation? Source:de Moor, J.M.; Aiuppa, A.; Pacheco, J.; Avard, G.; Kern, C.; Liuzzo, M.; Martinez, M.; Giudice, G.; Fischer, T.P. (2016). "Short-period volcanic gas precursors to phreatic eruptions: Insights from Poás Volcano, Costa Rica". Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 442: 218–227. Bibcode:2016E&PSL.442..218D. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2016.02.056. ISSN 0012-821X.

5x expanded by Brynnams (talk). Self-nominated at 16:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]

This article is a recent expansion but is not quite long enough. On 22 September 2020‎ it was 1191 characters whereas now it is 4710. The article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. Both hooks are no doubt true and are supported by the sources you give above, but the DYK criteria require the facts to be included in the article in a sentence with a citation at the end. Adding this extra information should enable you to expand the article sufficiently to meet the length requirement! No QPQ is needed here. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:16, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwmhiraeth: The nominator is a student editor and has not edited since November 4th. As the course doesn't end until December 12th, there's still a chance they could return, although they did not respond to an earlier talk page message. I have left a final message for them, but if they are still unresponsive, the nomination may need to be closed as abandoned. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:31, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is unfortunate that the course requirement seems to be to nominate the article at DYK but not to follow the nomination up until the hook appears on the main page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwmhiraeth: There has been a spate of these nominations and it has been disheartening given the high failure rate among student nominations. Hopefully something could be done about it, particularly on the Wiki Ed side of things, because it's simply not a good look for the project and these failures could further discourage students from improving their work. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:09, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Helaine (Wiki Ed) and Ian (Wiki Ed): Could either of you please contact the instructor? Neither the student nor the instructor have edited recently and issues raised above remain unaddressed. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:47, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwmhiraeth: I apologize for my delayed response. I added a sentence to the lead that mimics the DYK I wrote. Brynnams (talk) 01:13, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just reached out to the professor. Thanks for letting us know. Helaine (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:36, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, this nomination is good to go. It's an interesting article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:17, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]