Talk:Mullion, Cornwall

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cornwall Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:

Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!

Fisheries and Fishing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fisheries, aquaculture and fishing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fisheries and FishingWikipedia:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingTemplate:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingFishing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Village Description

There seems to be some confusion over the size and description of the village and particularly it's harbour. Mullion has a small harbour, capable of sheltering a handful of small fishing boats (not trawlers) at the most. Currently there are about six small boats kept at the harbour. The harbour is nearly dry at low tide, and is not large or deep enough to receive ships at any state of the tide (therefore it is not classed as a 'port'). Mullion harbour is not, nor has it at any point in it's life been a cargo port! The harbour was built to shelter the local fishing boats, and is now owned by the National Trust.

As for the settlement itself, it has a parish (not town) council, does not have a mayor, no town hall, no market charter and no industry. Even ignoring those definitions, I don't think that anyone who has been to Mullion would be able to confuse it with a town!

Of course other people may disagree with me, in which case I'd be interested in seeing any further debate about it...

TrevelyanD 12:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mullion, Cornwall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070228073416/http://www.catholic-forum.com:80/saintS/saintm0w.htm to http://www.catholic-forum.com/saints/saintm0w.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:31, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SEMI

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Due to 8 or 9 vandal edits and only 2 reversion, I am asking for WP:SEMI to prevent this from happening. An article can't be improved if WP:RCP people like me have to spend a lot of time reverting and warning VANDALS. As I wait reply, I will go trot over to some Talk pages and issues warnings for bad behavior. maybe go full WP:AIV on a couple if they have a bad rap sheet.L3X1 (talk) 22:10, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: requests for increases to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. - Mlpearc (open channel) 22:14, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reminding me, done. L3X1 (talk) 22:24, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]