Jump to content

Talk:Mujhse Dosti Karoge!/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 03:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 03:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • Improve the non-free rationale for the poster with this template.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 03:00, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Other than that, the infobox looks great.
  • Add a comma after Rani Mukerji and "Pooja Sahani (Mukerji)".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 03:00, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

[edit]
  • "Pooja, Raj and Tina" → "Pooja, Raj, and Tina"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "attracted Tina" → "attracted to Tina"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "with via e-mail" → "with him via e-mail"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add a comma after "her name".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "despite of being" → "despite being"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "realises" → "realizes"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "apologise" → "apologize"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Plot is under 700 words, so they're no problems with WP:FILMPLOT.

Cast

[edit]
  • Instead of citing the same source for every character, might I suggest adding a simple "Credits adapted from Bollywood Hungama.[2]" to the top of the section?
 Not done Because there are source I cited from Rediff.com and Box Office India. The actor who plays young Tina does not mentioned on Bollywood Hungama, as well as Raja Vaid. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 00:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Production

[edit]
  • "on 1996" → "on the 1996"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add a comma after "Mukerji, Roshan".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "stars in the film, because" → "star in the film because"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "looks was the" → "looks were the"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The reference after "Yash Raj Films" doesn't say Aditya Chopra was a producer.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the second paragraph, can you explain when the actors were cast?
No sources or links mentioned that. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "more ... about" → "more [...] about"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Soundtrack

[edit]
  • "described its soundtrack" → "described its soundtrack as"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "mixed response" → "mixed responses"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Release

[edit]
  • Remove the comma after "across India".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "total grossing" → "total gross"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove the comma after "(US$4.7 million)".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "It was opened" → "It opened"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The last sentence should be moved to #Critical_reception, which should be retitled #Reception.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

[edit]
  • Remove the comma after "of the leads".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "part as a" → "part as"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 04:38, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]
  • Try archiving all sources (either manually or with this tool).

Progress

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·