Jump to content

Talk:Mujahideen in Chechnya

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment

[edit]

The unit this article refers to has been known by may different names but no official one has ever been used. I know I am the one who came up with this name, but after some research I had to come to the conclusion that it refers to the Islamic International Peacekeeping Brigade and not to the unit created by Khattab in 1995. I think we can keep this name for the moment, but eventually we'll have to come up with a proper name. ForrestSjap (talk) 14:30, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If that's true then we shouldnt call the leader the "Amir of the International Islamic battalion" but simply "Amir of International Mujahideen" or something. I'll look into kavkazcenter articles to what they named it. - PietervHuis (talk) 14:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KC likes to refer to it as Amir of the "Arab Mujahideen". - PietervHuis (talk) 14:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hope this "Battalion" is not the Special Purpose Islamic Regiment? Only Hanzo would know this. Please keep in mind that KC is not a very reliable source. You must have at least one more reliable source. KavkazCenter includes a lot of disinformation planted by the FSB and others. This is very simple. Someone from the FSB calls to KC, claims that he is a representative of "Great Tigers of Islam" for example (although no one knows anything about such "Tigers") and claims a responsibility for a terrorist attack actually perpetrated by the FSB agents. There were also paid FSB Chechen agents like Arbi Barayev who organized the Special Purpose Islamic Regiment - the regiment that attacked the Moscow Theater later.Biophys (talk) 16:20, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No this is simply the batallion of the Arab Mujahideen. This "battalion" exists as they had their own leaders apointed. It turns out that the name "International Islamic Battalion" is faulty, I thought that was its official name because it was named like that in various articles. It turns out ForrestSjap named it like that, and its real name is simply International Mujahadeen or Arab Mujahideen. Its leaders were Ibn al-Khattab, then Abu al-Walid etc. - PietervHuis (talk) 17:18, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be renamed to "Arab Mujahideen in Chechnya" as its mentioned here: [1]. It's also named like this by the Jamestown Foundation and it's accurate. PietervHuis (talk) 18:01, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Forrest I'm think of copying part of the text you wrote about Mujahideen in Chechnya on the Mujahideen page to here if you don't mind. - PietervHuis (talk) 18:15, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

O'K, just include more sources in the article. Otherwise it might be deleted at some point.Biophys (talk) 19:08, 7 February 2008 (UTC) This is not a problem after your renaming. Of course Ibn al-Khattab and Abu al-Walid are notable.Biophys (talk) 19:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've been working on this article for some time before Pieter created it. I'll add some of the information I had already gathered and I'll start working on including proper references soon.ForrestSjap (talk) 20:38, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arab name

[edit]

It seems pretty hard to find out, but if someone can find the arab translation for this batallion that would be cool. - PietervHuis (talk) 13:50, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Primary source

[edit]

This document states the name of the leader in the Jama'at Islami as Fathi Mohamed Habib, a/k/a Sheikh Fathi Shishani (Sheikh Fathi).

Sheik Fathi al-Shishani seems to be the name most widely used. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 10:40, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.kavkazcenter.com/eng/content/2006/12/12/6803.shtml
    Triggered by \bkavkazcenter\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:10, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 01:23, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]