Talk:Muhammad Muhsin Khan/Archive 1

Archive 1

Overhaul

I am going to do a heavy overhaul of this page. Does anyone have any objections? ZaydHammoudeh 07:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Move the Page

I also think this page should be moved. The name is misspelled in the title (Muhamamd). I have not seen this translation anywhere so I am more or less sure this a mistake. ZaydHammoudeh 07:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Shi'a View

I think it seems kind of strange to use include the "Shi'a view" on him. If he is sunni, I think that says enough without saying that the shiat hold an unfavorable view of him. If we used that idea of a model, we would also have to saying the Ashar'i, Qadayani, etc. also hold unfavorable views. Similarly, we would need to say that this on all wikiarticles who dislikes that person. I think it is off the focus of the article and selective to include that. ZaydHammoudeh 03:59, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Shi'a do not hold a negative view of all Sunnis, for example, Maududi is quite ok, and the guy that made the pro-Shi'a fatwa is great in Shi'a view. But MMK is a biased lier. --Striver 15:57, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Shia aren't biased against Sunnis. We just don't like it when people deliberatly mistranslate verses such as 5:55. Armyrifle 19:13, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

It should be stated here for the sake of completeness that I never said that Shia hate all Sunnis. To interpret my point like that and then to try reply to this is like building up a straw man and then knocking it down. The point is that if we write the shia view of every scholar, then we need to include the Sunni view on every shia scholar. Then for every Sunni scholar, we need to include the Qadyani view and the Ashar'i view and the Jabriyyah view etc. This is doesn't make sense. It is inserting a POV as Striver clearly stated in his post. ZaydHammoudeh 20:35, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Declaring a person to be a "biased liar" is very, well, biased. I don't say this very often, but...lol. I agree with Zayd on this one. MezzoMezzo 05:51, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Noble Qur'an Khan1.gif

Image:Noble Qur'an Khan1.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Miller, Vandome, and McBrewster

Sources written by Miller, Vandome, and McBrewster need to be double checked (and possibly deleted) as per VDM Publishing § Wikipedia content duplication. Ihaveacatonmydesk (talk) 20:44, 29 October 2014 (UTC)