Talk:Muhammad Madni Ashraf Ashrafi Al-Jilani

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Islam Mid‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

Is this person really notable? (See Wikipedia:Notability.) If he is, where is the significant coverage in mainstream reliable sources? There are passing mentions of his name in reliable sources such as the Times of India.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:53, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes he is notableMajun e Baqi (talk) 10:31, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the significant coverage in mainstream reliable sources?-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:43, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Toddy1, looked at your article created counter, It shows you are an author of more than one hundred article, hope you will be able to find better sources rather than any newbie like meMajun e Baqi (talk) 11:04, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Toddy1, https://citytoday.news/islamic-scholar-hazarath-mufti-syed-mohd-madni-miyan-to-lead-jumma-prayer-at-masjid-azam-tomorrow/ this may help you Majun e Baqi (talk) 11:15, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is called a "passing mention".-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:22, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddy1:Kindly search on google with Madni Miyan to look for better sources as he is famous as Madni Miyan rather the article nameMajun e Baqi (talk) 11:24, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly search using his another name Madni Miyan thanksMajun e Baqi (talk) 11:19, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: kindly have a look to this article regarding notability. I have improved the article with many sources, Hope It looks like notable, lolMajun e Baqi (talk) 17:10, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I took a look, although I didn't have the time to assess each source individually. As NPP I would certainly pass this one on wp:notability grounds. If you wished to make sure of passing the strictest possible interpretation you could look through the supplied sources and mention 1 or 2 of them here which are independent and provide in-depth coverage of him. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 13:23, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

North8000, Thanks for your feedback, I think the notability issue was concerned so as per me and you we can pass it to notability, so a case could be made to remove the tag, lots of love for your help againMajun e Baqi (talk) 17:09, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Invited to comment again) My comment would be pretty much the same as my 17 July 2020 comment. With a couple of extra notes. Sourcing seems to have been further strengthened since then. The other is to note that you have not done as I suggested ("If you wished to make sure of passing the strictest possible interpretation you could look through the supplied sources and mention 1 or 2 of them here which are independent and provide in-depth coverage of him.") which is fine, but I'm just noting it here.North8000 (talk) 10:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

siasat.com

I see that you have been putting citations marked "siasat.com" into articles.

These are actually to a proper newspaper called The Siasat Daily (see [https://www.siasat.com/editorial-standards/ the paper's website), it is a good source. When you cite it, you need to help the reader to understand that it is a good source. Please could you amend your citations to that site, in the following ways:

Please change {{cite web | to either {{cite | or {{cite news |.
Please change website=siasat.com to work=[[The Siasat Daily]]
Please put the dates in normal format: e.g 4 September 2019.
If the article being cite has a "by line", you need to add the name of the author to the citation. For example, if the by line says "BY MOHAMMED HUSSAIN", then you need to add |first1=Mohammed |last1=Hussain. It there are several authors, you should list them all.

If you do this, it will improve the article, and give the reader a greater feeling of confidence that what he/she is reading is true.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:21, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If there is something you do not understand, ask.

Wikipedia is collaborative. Sometimes it may seem adversarial, when people ask you for proof - but the challenge is to improve the article where that is possible.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:24, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Toddy1, I have tried to establish its notability a bit, kindly have a look If you can improve more, lots of loveMajun e Baqi (talk) 17:28, 16 July 2020 (UTC) Majun e Baqi (talk) 17:17, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]