Talk:Muhammad Hashim Thattvi

Untitled

May I know who has written this article..please...You will be glad to know who I'am..andd thank you very much for this...Iam stuck in writing an article here at wiki...please help if you canCooldemocrat (talk) 18:43, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Author information is available via the article history. DS (talk) 02:55, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Junaid mansoor: where is the graveyard of Shaikh hasshim sindhi in thatta? Is it in maqlee graveyard? Also there are some clarifications required. In the start mentioned he belongs to naqshbandi then in the end he was linked with qadree sect of sufisim. Which is right? I think he belongs to qaree sect. Jmansoor (talk) 15:13, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://gmsyed.wesindhi.com/books/Shah_Latif_and_His_Message/chapter2_part6.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 09:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This URL only has about half of the material that was added yesterday, but I'm 99% sure the rest is a copy-paste from somewhere. -- John of Reading (talk) 09:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sorry about that copy pasted passage I thought to do it like this that copy paste the text and then give the reference, wasn't able to do it because of electrical power failure that suddenly happened and it got back just now. This is something really common in Pakistan. Thanks that you told me that it's the wrong way to do it I'am sorry and promise of not doing it again. Whereas the rest of the portion that was added yesterday is concerned. No it's not at all a copy paste I have written it myself and may I re-add it? 175.110.102.101 (talk) 18:16, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you can put the rest back provided you adapt it to show where the information is coming from. Wikipedia articles must be based on information that has already been published in reliable sources. Please read, or at least skim, the Wikipedia guildelines on verifiability and original research. -- John of Reading (talk) 21:09, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]