Talk:Mud Blood/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Lirim.Z (talk · contribs) 03:49, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Lead and infobox
[edit]- Is there maybe a cover?
- There isn't any cover for the single since the cover of Selfocracy is used instead.
- Add streaming audio. Music is consumed mostly through streaming today.
Done
Background and composition
[edit]- add streaming audio
- Done
Reception
[edit]- No issues.
- Thank you!
Promotion and music video
[edit]- Are the YouTube Links the only way to source his live performances?
- There may be some magazine reports about some of Nottet's performances, but the YT links can be used here since they are provided by a reliable channel. Cartoon network freak (talk) 10:51, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- Add: Since it's release the music video was watched over 4,3 million times. (As of October 2018) This gives the reader an perception of how successful the video was.
- Done I only wrote "four million" since I don't want to update this every few months lol :)
Tracklisting, Charts, Release history
[edit]- The song reached no. 44 on the Airplay Chart.[1]
- Done Indeed! I added this!
Other
[edit]References
[edit]- As far as I checked them, the references do cover the assertations made in this article
- Thank you!
- Ref 1, 3, 6, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 17, 21, 25, 26, 28: Adjust the date format.
- These date formats were added by the IABot when it archived refs in the article. It could stay likt this, I think.
- Ref 6: 'Virgin Radio' and not 'Virgina Radio'
- Done
- Ref 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 26: YouTube is not the publisher of the video, it's the label or the radio' Rather use 'via=YouTube' and 'publisher=Jive Epic'
- This isn't really necessary. YouTube is still the overall provider of the video, and I haven't seen the 'via=' construction on many articles.
Copy-violation
[edit]- 46,8% That is really high, but you used a lot of direct quotes from the lyrics and from an interview, so in this case, it should be fine.
- Thank you!
- No dead links.
- Thank you!
Outcome
[edit]
On hold There are some small things to work on here, but all in all a good article. I'll grant you 7 days to edit the article. Best regards --Lirim | Talk 03:49, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Lirim.Z: Hi there and thank you very much for reviewing my GAN! I responded to all your comments, but I think some suggested changes were not really necessary. Again, thank you! Regards! Cartoon network freak (talk) 11:00, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- I am passing this article. Not really my kind of music, but still a good article.--Lirim | Talk 11:12, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Lirim.Z: Hi there and thank you very much for reviewing my GAN! I responded to all your comments, but I think some suggested changes were not really necessary. Again, thank you! Regards! Cartoon network freak (talk) 11:00, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.