Jump to content

Talk:Mucho Macho Man/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 17:02, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

  • Be consistent with date formats in the article, there's a difference in the info box versus the prose.
    • Fixed, I think, we want US dates (mm-dd-yyyy), holler if you see any I missed. --MTBW
  • Not sure that's the Fort Larned you're after.
    • Fixed. --MTBW
  • Sometimes "Classic" is in the wikilink, other times it's outside the wikilink. Should be consistent.
    • Not sure consistency is the ideal but maybe it is. Discuss? - We have a problem in that we have 2013 Breeders' Cup, about that year's overall races, and we have Breeders' Cup Classic about the specific race, but all years. I tweaked the lead to link each one once. But unlike, say 2013 Kentucky Derby, no article about the specific race each year. He ran two years (2012 and 2013) and is being pointed to run it again in 2014. So for the rest of the article, I just don't know which way to go- the race or the year. What do you think would be the best solution, given the situation? -MTBW
  • "two and three-year-old" methinks I would have a hyphen after two here, so "two- and three-year-old..."
    • Fixed -- MTBW
  • "Kathy Ritvo, each survived from being near death in 2008; Kathy Ritvo..." no need to repeat first names after they're used the first time.
    • Fixed, want to be careful to avoid confusion, as her husband Tim briefly was the trainer of the horse. --MTBW
  • "Reeves'." never sure, but not understanding if you really need that apostrophe...
    • In "sold to Dean and Patti Reeves' Reeves Thoroughbred Racing" it's a possessive, so I think that is correct; tossed the other two. Does that work? --MTBW
  • "He he had lost". He he.
    • Aw, c'mon, you couldn't catch that in your other drive-by edits? LOL! FIXED! --MTBW
  • " the LONGINES World's Best Racehorse Rankings" maybe different for horse-racing articles but in football articles we tend to avoid sponsors (especially if they're SHOUTING!).
    • Yeah, and boy, I know I'm super-irritated by crap like this, -- saw other hiccups, so I tweaked a bunch of stuff there. --MTBW
  • Don't think you need to link Breeders' Cup in the 2013 section.
    • See above about the overall issue, but you are right about overlinking there, so I tossed most of it. Better now? --MTBW
  • David Cohen is a dab link.
    • I agree, but I don't know how to fix it with the sortname parameter on the chart - the other ones (Smith, Stevens) we used middle initial to get to the right article. This guy doesn't appear to have an article, and unlike both of those others, even equibase doesn't give me a middle initial. Any ideas how to fix this? --MTBW
  • Sortable table so link all linkable items every time.
    • Bleech. OK. FIXED --MTBW
  • July 17 winning margin is just "length" and isn't sorting correctly if it just means by one length.
    • You know, I think the solution here is to make that an unsortable column. You OK with that? --MTBW
  • Also would expect neck and nose to sort as shorter than a length, but not below the N/As.n
  • Any reason why Trainer column isn't sortable?
    • Nope, fixed (think it was done for the other horse article we swiped it from, one with only one trainer)
  • Is there a reason why odds can't all be to the same number of decimal places?
    • I think we took them straight from the charts that way, but I'm OK with putting them all to two places. Did I catch all of them? (eyesight sucks) --MTBW
  • You have Grade I in the prose but Grade 1 in the table, I would be consistent.
    • Fixed --MTBW
  • Why is Mr Prospector in bold?
    • In the pedigree? So are several others, I believe it is because these are Black Type horses (i.e. stakes winners). Standard jargon in race horse land, at least for the Thoroughbreds. Tigerboy1966 did the chart, I think, it's consistent across other Thoroughbred articles where the editor knows his/her pedigree stuff. --MTBW

It's to denote that MMM is "linebred"tee hee 4x4 to Mr. Prospector (usually has an explanation "appears twice in 4th generation of pedigree" or something to that effect below chart). Froggerlaura ribbit 05:43, 17 January 2014 (UTC) AH! @Froggerlaura:, can you add that bit? I can clean up the sourcing, we did the same for Oxbow at FAC. Montanabw(talk) 08:40, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Added blurb at bottom of chart, the equineline chart has the Xs at the end. Froggerlaura ribbit 18:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
THANKS! Montanabw(talk) 19:13, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Generally very good, few niggles above to be resolved before I promote to GA. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:19, 16 January 2014 (UTC

@The Rambling Man:I think I got everything I could get and asked questions about the rest. I look forward to your further review and discussion! Montanabw(talk) 22:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@The Rambling Man:,@Froggerlaura:, OK, trout slap me if you want, but I went on a bender and added a bunch of new stuff to the pedigree section. Will need additional review. Also see the bit of extra material I added on Nick Petro, and on MMM's health problems in 2011 and 2013. I'll fix any screwups. Sorry to temporarily destabilize the article (and more will be added Saturday night or Sunday morning, after the Sunshine Millions and the Eclipse Awards ceremony). I hope we can finalize this GAN on Monday after the dust settles. Montanabw(talk) 22:51, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, please let me know when you're done! The Rambling Man (talk) 08:49, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man:: OK, I'm done adding assorted new material and yet another round of heartwarming stories and odd coincidences. Have at it. For convenience, this is the diff between your last edit and the present. I PROMISE to leave it alone now until you take a look (fingers crossed...) He won't race again until March, probably, so stable at this point. Montanabw(talk) 01:34, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will try to get to it tomorrow, other things have taken precedence all of a sudden, sorry. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:39, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

  • " Dream Team Racing" and "Dream Team One Racing Stable" and "Dream Team One" Are these all the same entity?
    Yes, I tossed one of those, and the only remaining time I have "Dream Team One" left is a sentence or so after saying "Dream Team One Racing Stable" -- it just seemed clunky to say the whole thing twice that close together, but if you want them all the same, I can live with it.. Do advise. --MTBW
  • "Mucho Macho Man endured several health.." this paragraph reads entirely as if his career has ended. Perhaps you could reword to make it clear he's still running.
    Changed to "has overcome" -- does that work? I'm also torn between using past and present tense, present tense more logical, yet clunky sometimes. I'm open to thoughts on this. --MTBW
  • "to a glued-on horseshoe" just the one?
    TYPO! Damn, thought I got all of those. FIXED--MTBW
  • "at odds of 6–1, " you have decimal odds in the table, any reason for the mix in format?
    Narrative flow, mostly. People are familiar with the ratio format. Tigerboy did the original narrative, but Equibase uses decimal odds - and I also suck at conversions, so don't want to try converting the decimal odds for 23 races. This occurs on other horse racing articles. For example Oxbow (horse) which survived FAC with this same issue. --MTBW
  • The ref which shows him being 13th equal (currently ref 47) which has LONGINES in the ref doesn't have LONGINES mentioned.
  • Like Tigerboy said. Fixed.
  • "four and a half lengths" would expect the length to be hyphenated in prose.
    Not required in US English. I hate excess hyphens. If it's an issue, you can add them and I won't remove them, though ;-) --MTBW
  • "Mucho Macho Man and his connections" followed by "the connections of Mucho Macho Man confirmed" repetitive.
    Reworded two instances. Should be fixed now. Better? --MTBW
  • "It was." not quite the brilliant prose I'd expect.
    OK, more brilliant now? ;-) --MTBW
  • "he handily won" don't think you need "handily" as the length of the win is self-explanatory.
    I'm thinking about the kid who is living in his mom's basement, never saw a horse race, and would raise a WP:CHEESE argument here, c'mon! (Oh, all right, fixed!) --MTBW
  • Ref 69 should be Miami Herald in italics. Check other works in the refs.
    I think I got the newspapers italicized. citeweb can create confusing results and running reflinks nods toward citeweb. But...Fixed? --MTBW

The Rambling Man (talk) 07:49, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: Anything further? Montanabw(talk) 06:24, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, better now, promoting. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:27, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! @Tigerboy1966: @Froggerlaura: congrats to you two as well for all you do! Montanabw(talk) 09:17, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mucho_Macho_Man/GA1&oldid=1137024267"