Talk:Mrs. John L. Strong
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
sounds like a promotion of the company, so I added a NPOV tag GB 08:58, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Re: POV dispute
[edit]Dear Mr. Graham, While I understand your possible objection to an advertisement, this stub is in fact a legitimate commerical history, and is similar (and in fact more objective) than many online right now, including Chanel, Christian Dior, Tiffany and Company, Smythson, Coach, and others. Might you suggest a phrase that offended you that could be removed so as to eliminate your POV objection? Many thanks 205.231.28.61 15:18, 11 March 2007 (UTC)nick nicholson205.231.28.61 15:18, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Called the “ne plus ultra of chic stationery companies” - sounds like a marketing promotion, but if this is used by others you may need a reference to suppport it. Also the list of clientel is a bit over the top! The rest of the article is not bad. GB 21:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)