Talk:Mr. Wiggles

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Vote for Deletion

This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 03:47, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

This is really written in an extremely fan boyish manner. I respect the work of Mr. Wiggles, but this does need to be more nuetral.

It says right before the appendices: -- Written by manager Robbin Dunn, that is a pretty good explanation for the NPOV problem and shows that Mr. Dunn isn't completely familiar with wikipedia either... Arru 00:02, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to try clean this up, section by section using the current text as basis. Arru 14:18, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

…and done! I still think there's too much trivia and namedropping, Wiggles is mainly known as a funk style dancer and that's what should be the focus of the article. And perhaps some more on his role in RSC. Anyhow, I kept the NPOV sign hanging, someone else should give it a look too. Arru 15:12, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ya'll need to relax

i can't beeleeve that a articel about mr. wiggles has a neutrality dispute. talk about obbsessive. ya'll need to poplock yoSELVES. --Ghetteaux 00:11, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Step off, homie! No, seriously, it used to be a lot worse. Maybe you're trying to say that the NPOV is resolved? No? Arru 09:18, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yes, that IS what i'm sayin. seemz like Mr Wiggles got his due propz, but w/o getting all biased. keep it reel. --Ghetteaux 14:15, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated vandalism

Someone who uses different IPs keeps vandalising this page. Someone lock this page down from childish idiots like this from editing it. BishopTutu 19:14, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicated article

Um... this page is duplicated at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr._Wiggles. I don't know how to rectify that. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.59.100.184 (talk) 11:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

What? That's the same URL on this connecting article. BishopTutu 16:18, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mr. Wiggles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050820023802/http://www.mrwiggles.biz/ to http://www.mrwiggles.biz/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:50, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]