Talk:Mount Thielsen/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- In the Geology section, "Much erosion from glacial movement has lead to significant deformity at the cone", I think you mean "led" instead of "lead".
- Done, it was in the lead too. :)
- Oops, that's my bad, was in a bit of a hurry, so, check.
- Done, it was in the lead too. :)
- In the Geology section, "Much erosion from glacial movement has lead to significant deformity at the cone", I think you mean "led" instead of "lead".
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- In the History and geography section, you might want to correctly link "Three Sisters" to its correspondence article. The article tends to have "red links", if they don't have articles, it would be best to un-link them, per here. Since this article is not international, you might want to change "metre" to "meter".
- Done.
- Check.
- Done.
- In the History and geography section, you might want to correctly link "Three Sisters" to its correspondence article. The article tends to have "red links", if they don't have articles, it would be best to un-link them, per here. Since this article is not international, you might want to change "metre" to "meter".
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Reference 3 is missing Publisher info.
- Done.
- Check.
- Done.
- Reference 3 is missing Publisher info.
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- In the lead, this ---> "Its skiing trails are also popular", sounds like POV. Also, you should avoid the term "popular", per here.
- Done.
- Check.
- Done.
- In the lead, this ---> "Its skiing trails are also popular", sounds like POV. Also, you should avoid the term "popular", per here.
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- Did you forget to add the "thumb" to Image:Mount Thielsen.jpg? Or is it supposed to be like that?
- Done.
- Check.
- Done.
- Did you forget to add the "thumb" to Image:Mount Thielsen.jpg? Or is it supposed to be like that?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Not much to do. If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!
- Pass or Fail:
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- How were you exams? Your comments have been resolved. Ceranthor 21:14, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- They were a bit excruciating, but I know I did well. I still have some left, but their easy topics, so. :) Good luck on your exams. Anyways, after reading the article, I have gone off and passed the article. Congratulations. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you to Ceranthor who worked so hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:27, 31 March 2009 (UTC)