Talk:Mount Tabor, Portland, Oregon

Volcanoes Low‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More research

Needs more research-- I think "crater" may not be the correct term here? And what is the hill that is higher than the cut-away cone, is that another cone? Or some debris pile? -Chira 04:15, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The area in question should be referred to as a cross-section exposure of the cinder cone and ejecta.

The whole of Mt. Tabor is technically a cinder cone, but is mostly comprised of quartzite. The Troutdale Gravel Field once covered the area, and this area was not washed away with the surrounding area due to heat and moisture from the volcanic activity. -BridgedToMono 08:03, 27 February 2006

USGS

Consistancy

This article is inconsistant with the article on Pilot Butte regarding extinct volcanoes within the limits of US cities. Here it states that there are at least 3 in Portland alone while in the Pilot Butte article it states that there are only two within all US cites. I don't know which is correct and I would even guess that the number of cities containing some sort of extinct volcanic feature in the US is much much larger. --Burntnickel 16:15, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Burntnickel: There are at least 3 within Portland city limits: Mt. Tabor, Kelly Butte, Rocky Butte. I think there are others, they're all listed at the Boring Lava Field article. Mount Tabor is frequently referred to as "the only," but I think that's just because it's the most-visited one. The other city is Bend. -Pete 21:33, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation

Per Wikipedia naming conventions, the article with this title should be about the neighborhood, and an article named Mount Tabor (Oregon) about the volcano should be split off from it. Any objections? Katr67 21:20, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it- I like the current arrangement, but I'm sure once the neighborhood article gets expanded a bit your suggestion will make more sense. -Pete 21:33, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done Done! by Pete. Two years later. WikiIsSlow. I like it. Katr67 (talk) 18:11, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

:) -Pete (talk)