This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
A fact from Mount Sandel Mesolithic site appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 December 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is of the utmost importance and must be one of the most neglected wikipedia entries. That it is similarly neglected and all but ignored on the local council's website is hardly surprising, considering some of the local representatives beliefs that the world was not even in existence at the time Mount Sandel was first settled. Belacqua Shuah (talk) 19:55, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Complete nonsense the vast majority of people who live in this area like myself,have no such beliefs you are talking about a small number of people. The main reason why it’s been mainly ignored is more political as it proves that the first people to settle in Ireland came from the island of Great Britain likely Scotland which doesn’t suit the narrative that the Irish people are not and were not of “British “ethnicity and this is proof that they most certainly were. The majority of the population don’t even know the long history of their area and it’s historical 2A00:23C8:9C62:F601:F1BF:D8ED:AD3A:DAFE (talk) 14:54, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original orplagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Theleftorium(talk)20:01, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]