Talk:Mount Greylock/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mr. R00t ^Talk 19:41, 22 August 2010 (UTC) Review done. This is now a good article. Mr. R00t ^Talk 19:41, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Note

Review abandoned as per WT:Good article nominations#Mount Greylock. New reviewer please start under here. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:49, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

GA Criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: - Mostly.

   C. No original research: -probably not

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc: -<l>No edit wars but plenty of vandalism</l> None in last 60 days.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

It looks good to go. Mr. R00t ^Talk 19:40, 22 August 2010 (UTC)