Talk:Mount Gareloi/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- Starting review.Pyrotec (talk) 21:06, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Initial review
[edit]This article appears to be at or about the right level for a GA-class article.
Here are my initial comments:
- I'm not sure that History is a suitable title for the two sentences that it contains, particularly when there is another section called 'Eruptive history'. Perhaps 'Discovery' or 'Discovery of the island' might be a more apt title?
- Done.
- The page numbers quoted for the 'Coombs, McGimsey and Browne' in-line citations do not match what is in that paper. They might be pdf file page numbers, but they don't match the page numbers in the article.
- My computer doesn't let me see those article numbers, I apologize. Would you mind adding them for me? Sorry to be a bother. ceranthor 16:33, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- OK, I was just about to do it and then I noticed your remark above.Pyrotec (talk) 16:41, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Done.Pyrotec (talk) 19:12, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- OK, I was just about to do it and then I noticed your remark above.Pyrotec (talk) 16:41, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Threat - This is much more 'woolly' than Coombs, McGimsey and Browne. I'm fairly certain that it is not an accurate summary of what they wrote (but I will be checking it).
- I will get around to rewriting the section today. ceranthor 16:42, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Pyrotec (talk) 21:37, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
main review
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A interesting topic on an isolate area.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Congratulations on the quality of the article, I'm awarding GA status.Pyrotec (talk) 21:20, 22 May 2009 (UTC)