Talk:Mount Daniel

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Peaks section

I worked on the Peaks section and I don't think there is any major difference between what is reported by PeakBagger and Fred Becky. I think the prior version was just the result of a misunderstanding of the PeakBagger page. I did a map plot to help me visualize the situation and you can view it here. The stuff about vertical datums is a bit over the top (IMHO) but is necessary if the NAVD 88 elevation is to be shown in the infobox. See the U.S. vertical datum section on the Wikiproject Mountains page. –droll [chat] 04:02, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good sleuthing work, Droll. I went ahead and used the coordinates and elevation of the west summit in the infobox, because {{Infobox mountain/doc}} says that we should be using the maximum elevation of the mountain. —hike395 (talk) 12:50, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the stuff about VERTCON conversion. See my note above. None of the other elevations are converted so converting the elevation of only one peak just adds confusion. –droll [chat] 21:17, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]