Talk:Mothers of the Movement

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Black Lives Matter, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Black Lives Matter on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Black Lives MatterWikipedia:WikiProject Black Lives MatterTemplate:WikiProject Black Lives MatterBlack Lives Matter articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

African diaspora Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Naomiis. Peer reviewers: Meaghanfrost, Mbfrancisco1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:13, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kloesimone01, Jclark17. Peer reviewers: Kloesimone01, Jclark17, Gstew42.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:13, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Katiekassler.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:13, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jbyrd27, Dianthia Williams.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:13, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Additional sources

Some additional secondary sources that may be of use in expanding the entry:

In case anyone gets to these sooner than I do. Innisfree987 (talk) 18:20, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

Hi, I want to say that I like your article. I think you should add more to it but overall it is good. Good luck! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramanit (talk • contribs) 04:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

Hi Kloesimone01, Jclark17, I wanted to drop you a quick note about the content you've been adding. The first addition was completely unsourced, which is why it was removed by Innisfree987. All content needs to be sourced, but potentially controversial content especially needs to be sourced well - and anything political in nature is considered to be inherently controversial. The second addition was better, as it had sourcing, but it still had content issues - most notably that it stated that Clinton lost the Democratic nomination to Sanders, which she didn't.

Overall you also need to be careful to avoid redundancy - ie, repeating the same content twice in different ways - as well as tone and maintaining a neutral point of view. Basically, readers should not be able to see the author's opinion in the piece and the article shouldn't be for or against the MotM, as the article should just give the basic facts and leave it up to the reader to make their own decisions.

I think that it would be best if the two of you drafted out your content in your userspace prior to adding it to the article, as this way you can kind of get your ducks in a row as far as sourcing, flow, tone, and all of this information goes. It's generally what I tend to do when I'm writing content out on my main account, as it gives me more time to prepare. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:58, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shalor (Wiki Ed), thanks for this great advice. I'd add a recommendation to take care to make sure not only to add references, but also that each reference verifies a specific claim you make in an entry. Like Shalor says, if a claim is uncontroversial, a reference isn't required by WP policy, but giving every claim a reference to a reliable source is still a great practice, because it will help make sure that every item you add to the entry is really accurate, rather than something you thought to be true but turned out not to be (e.g. that Clinton lost.) Hope that helps! Innisfree987 (talk) 18:34, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]