Talk:Mosque of Amir al-Maridani
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mosque of Amir al-Maridani. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://maqrizi.com/mosque_pages/m_al-Maridani.html - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629165428/http://archnet.org/library/sites/one-site.jsp?site_id=3484 to http://archnet.org/library/sites/one-site.jsp?site_id=3484
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://maqrizi.com/mosque_pages/m_al-Maridani.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:58, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
"Architectural Commonalities" section relevant?
[edit]Is this section really relevant or needed? No other pages on similar buildings has a section like this, and it would be understood that buildings from the same city and period would share commonalities anyways. I would propose removing it. If there are any notable commonalities with another building (e.g. an unusual feature for the period that inspired another building, or vice-versa), I suggest it would be more usefully mentioned in the description sections above.(Casual Builder (talk) 22:49, 22 May 2019 (UTC))