Talk:Moscow

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 22 April 2024

The weather data is outdated. Here it says: The last decade was the warmest in the history of meteorological observations of Moscow. Temperature changes in the city are depicted in the table below:

But it gives data from 2008 to 2018, this is not the last decade. Below is the updated weather box with weather data from the last decade, i.e., from 2014 to 2024.

The weather box needs to be updated so that this makes sense.

Updated weather box is given below

Climate data for Moscow (2014–2024, VVC)
Month	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec	Year
Mean daily maximum °C (°F)	−4.2 (24.4)	−1.6 (29.1)	4.3 (39.7)	11.7 (53.1)	19.3 (66.7)	22.9 (73.2)	24.4 (75.9)	23.7 (74.7)	17.0 (62.6)	8.7 (47.7)	1.8 (35.2)	−2 (28)	10.5 (50.9)
Daily mean °C (°F)	−6.2 (20.8)	−3.7 (25.3)	0.8 (33.4)	7.3 (45.1)	14.1 (57.4)	17.7 (63.9)	19.6 (67.3)	18.8 (65.8)	13.0 (55.4)	6.3 (43.3)	0.3 (32.5)	−3.4 (25.9)	7.1 (44.8)
Mean daily minimum °C (°F)	−7.9 (17.8)	−5.8 (21.6)	−2.7 (27.1)	2.9 (37.2)	8.9 (48.0)	12.5 (54.5)	14.9 (58.8)	13.9 (57.0)	9.1 (48.4)	3.8 (38.8)	−1.2 (29.8)	−4.7 (23.5)	3.6 (38.5)
Mean monthly sunshine hours	37	65	142	213	274	299	323	242	171	88	33	14	1,901
Source: weatheronline.co.uk

Weather box to be replaced is given below

Climate data for Moscow (2009–2018, VVC)
Month	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec	Year
Mean daily maximum °C (°F)	−6 (21)	−3.6 (25.5)	2.4 (36.3)	11.4 (52.5)	20.1 (68.2)	22.6 (72.7)	25.8 (78.4)	23.9 (75.0)	16.7 (62.1)	7.9 (46.2)	2.1 (35.8)	−2.4 (27.7)	10.2 (50.4)
Daily mean °C (°F)	−7.9 (17.8)	−6 (21)	−1 (30)	6.9 (44.4)	14.7 (58.5)	17.6 (63.7)	20.7 (69.3)	18.9 (66.0)	12.9 (55.2)	5.5 (41.9)	0.7 (33.3)	−3.9 (25.0)	6.6 (43.9)
Mean daily minimum °C (°F)	−9.7 (14.5)	−8.3 (17.1)	−4.5 (23.9)	2.3 (36.1)	9.4 (48.9)	12.5 (54.5)	15.6 (60.1)	13.8 (56.8)	9.1 (48.4)	3.1 (37.6)	−0.7 (30.7)	−5.4 (22.3)	3.1 (37.6)
Mean monthly sunshine hours	37	65	142	213	274	299	323	242	171	88	33	14	1,901
Source: weatheronline.co.uk

}} Mountebank1 (talk) 07:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

 Done — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) (talk) 07:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

References

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 July 2024

My suggestion is to add in the first paragraph: Moscow is the third-most-populated capital in the world. 108.7.77.5 (talk) 18:01, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Not done, would need a reliable source, and such claims are always very dependent on how administrative lines are drawn and cities are defined. CMD (talk) 02:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

@Chipmunkdavis

the source is ironically Wikipedia, lol. Wikipedia states that as fact. the source (reliability could be questioned) is the Russian government itself. however, Google disputes that fact. Shanghai is stated there at 26 million residents. Jmurphy042000 (talk) 23:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

@Jmurphy042000, Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Please see Reliability of Wikipedia, Citing Wikipedia, Wikipedia is not a reliable source, Why wikipedia is not so great. also read Replies to common objections of Wikipedia. kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 10:21, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

@KEmel49 isn't that a little... ironic or redundant. so we take the time to make this site as valid and accurate as possible and then when using said site that's "not accurate or valid"? would you like the original source instead? do I really have to get the original source from the page for it to be "ok"? sources have to be valid, this making the article valid, correct? so what exactly is the issue. Jmurphy042000 (talk) 10:28, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

also, what is a valid source then? do a simple Google search, and the numbers vary but up to 8-10 million inhabitants. so what exactly is valid? that is not to be rude or ignorant. This is a genuine question because if the largest free encyclopedia isn't valid, what is valid? Russia? the world atlas? satista? I understand that people can edit articles. However, if we ourselves call this site invalid or unreliable sources, what exactly are we doing with our time??? the more people put that out there, instead of making it valid, it will always have that negative association. what is the point of Wikipedia then? there are reasons everything is double-checked and validated. however, what is reliable? What site or source is the most valid and incorruptible source out there? Jmurphy042000 (talk) 10:35, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

I have already provided some essays which are sufficient enough to your questions. i think you also need to see Are Wikis Reliable Source? kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 13:10, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 July 2024

Update GDP data from 2021 to 2022

Demographics title from "Federal city" to "Total"

GDP from ₽24.471 trillion to ₽28.507 trillion

Per capita form ₽1,935,205 to ₽2,182,863

Source: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/VRP_s_1998.xlsx

Source title: Валовой региональный продукт по субъектам Российской Федерации в 2016-2022 гг. 84.15.189.165 (talk) 02:02, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done for now: The source you have provided is a russian government source and is in russian language (Which is not a problem though) but you should also provide some more sources backing the same data.

Federal city Can't be changed to Total as it says the GDP of Federal City area. For example see article of other cities like Mumbai. kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 10:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

population as largest city in Europe ranking

Moscow is no longer the largest city in Europe by population. Istanbul currently holds that honor and title. This should be updated to reflect the current, up to date, and accurate information. Jmurphy042000 (talk) 23:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Not done for now: Please provide reliable sources to back your claim.
Note: To request an edit to any Extended Confirm protected pages, use Template:Edit extended-protected on talk page.kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 10:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)