Talk:Morty Diamond
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tillercat. Peer reviewers: Oddball3029, Wildwest04, Lolacorb.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:13, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]The article is succinct as the author provides only the necessary and needed information. The article is also a good one because it is impartial. It does not seek to influence any one's opinion but only to provide the necessary information. The sources used in the article are relevant, note worthy and scholarly which lends to creating a well researched body of work. However, the page author needs to fix the headings in the filmography section as the column headings for year and role have been switched. It would also be nice if the Biography section had more background information for the film maker, for example when he was born, earlier tertiary education, and other such information. It would also be nice if in the career section, the editor provided subheadings to address the different career sectors the film maker is involved in. The article would also benefit from the addition of categories as the article does not have any right now. Wildwest04 (talk) 02:41, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]The article has lots of information with tons of references so way to go on that!! A few minor changes to be made are the formatting of the headers needs to be ironed out, for example, why is there a references marker underneath the header of filmography? It creates and unnecessary space between lines. The "career" section needs to be reorganized into a chronological order, starting from oldest work to newest/current work. Great job finding a review of one of the books too! Also maybe put the awards and nominations into a table? Overall, it is really well done! Oddball3029 (talk) 14:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]This article is really well researched and all of the sources you use are reliable and scholarly. What you have written so far is very informative and I feel that you have given a concise and impartial overview of the work and accomplishments of Morty Diamond. References are used frequently and when necessary which shows that what you are writing is backed up by evidence and not your own opinion.
In order to improve your Wikipedia page I would say that you need to go into more depth about each film Diamond has worked on as what you have written is a good starting point, albeit a bit brief. In addition to this, some more biographical information and details about his background would be beneficial.
In addition I think that your Wikipedia page would benefit from a picture and also an info box to make it look more professional and give it a more finalised look— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lolacorb (talk • contribs) 20:20, 15 November 2016 (UTC)