Talk:Mortuary science
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mortuary science article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
[edit]
This page is terrible! It needs to be rewriten to meet wiki quality standards, omit original research, and possibly rewritten by an actual mortician!
- I did a copyedit-overhaul on the page; tried to remove POV and un-encyclopedic language, and add balance. I'm not a mortician, which means I don't have professional knowledge, but also probably means less conflict of interest. I removed the POV and cleanup banners, but feel free to replace them if my edits have not met the burden of impartialization (is that a word?). Boneyard90 (talk) 13:34, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Poorly referenced
[edit]One source, identified only as "Bureau", is referenced nine times! What is the proper identification of this source? Dmarquard (talk) 07:59, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- Look in the "References" section at the body. Bureau of Labor Statistics... - Boneyard90 (talk) 13:53, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Seriously...?
[edit]"Students applying for mortuary science should have a plan about it and must develop passion for the study before applying for the course at the college level. This would make students study hard and become knowledgeable on the subject matter." What kind of writing is this? This is an encyclopedia. Transfo47 (talk) 09:52, 16 July 2020 (UTC)