Talk:Mortuary Chapel, Maryborough Cemetery

	Australia portal Mortuary Chapel, Maryborough Cemetery is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Merge with Maryborough Cemetery

When I created these two articles, the mortuary chapel was heritage-listed but the cemetery itself was not. Since then, the entry for the heritage listing of the mortuary chapel (that is, same number) has changed title and contents to include the whole cemetery of which the mortuary chapel is just an element. Given that, it seems logical to have them as a single article. Kerry (talk) 23:58, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 14:56, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kerry Raymond: are you able to update the QHR text of this one? Looks a bit odd in current merged form. The Drover's Wife (talk) 19:38, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IIRC, the situation is that originally it was only the mortuary chapel that was heritage-listed, but then at some point of my original WHR rollout, they decided to heritage-list the whole cemetery including the mortuary chapel under a new entry number. So when had finished all the pre-2014 HR listings, I then went and added articles for all the “new” (post 2014) listings, resulting in the second article (as I had forgotten about the earlier one). So yes they need to be merged, indeed I think it might have been me that flagged them as needing merging but then forgot about them. When i’m home, I’ll take a look at my original drafts and see if there’s anything lost through the merger that needs to be recovered. Kerry (talk) 20:03, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]