Jump to content

Talk:Mortimer Grimshaw

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleMortimer Grimshaw has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 5, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 24, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the character Slackbridge from Dickens' novel Hard Times was based on strike leader Mortimer Grimshaw?

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Mortimer Grimshaw/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: DCI2026 (talk · contribs) 19:19, 30 November 2012 (UTC) I will begin this review as soon as possible, and hope to get my comments posted in a like fashion. dci | TALK 19:19, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Preston strike of 1853

[edit]

Later career

[edit]

Overall comments

[edit]
OK, a couple more replies:
  • Included a sentence about why there was no further role for him in the unions.
  • Added a couple of sentences of info about Ernest Jones' labour parliament.
  • Couldn't find anything more about his location in America, he was just too low profile then.
  • Found a source for his pro-Confederacy leanings, so I've added a bit about that.
Just waiting to see what to change in the lead now. Are the changes I've made OK? BigDom (talk) 20:41, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Everything looks excellent; I see no further issues in the body of the article. As for the lead: I think right now it focuses a bit heavily on his achievements, given the amount of information on his later falling out with the unions. I no longer think it's necessary to trim anything, but, as the man ended his days as a "notorious scoundrel" selling his services to both sides, there should be more information on that in the third paragraph. Other than that, the article is pretty much good to go. Thanks for your quick and quality revisions. dci | TALK 01:14, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I would also suggest trimming or splitting the first sentence of the third paragraph, it's a bit of a run-on. dci | TALK 01:18, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Right, I've had a bash at the lead, see what you think. BigDom (talk) 10:45, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]