Talk:Mortal Kombat X/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: GamerPro64 (talk · contribs) 21:38, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Staking a claim on this one. Will do a throughout look soon. GamerPro64 21:38, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
- Sources
- Starting off with the sources, Niche Gamer, EventHub, Arcade Sushi, Shoryuken were deemed unreliable to use. I went to the Sources talk page to double check if Niche Gamer is still unreliable but until then there should be a different source for that section. TestYourMight.com might also be unreliable.
- PlayStationLifestyle is also used, which doesn't have a real consensus of its reliability. Same goes for Game Rant. I don't even know what Game & Guide is but I question the reliability of it too.
- Also, there should be some consistency to the way the sources are cited. Some sources don't have the name of the writers in them. Game Informer is shown both as "Game Informer" and "Gameinformer.com". The section just needs an entire overhaul.
- Gameplay
- There are now "Citation Needed" tags in it.
- Characters
- There's a "Citation Needed" tag in it.\
- The section should probably be merged into the "Plot" section just like how Mortal Kombat (2011 video game) has it.
Honestly I don't have much faith in the article passing GAN in its current state. Gonna have to look into it more before judging it. GamerPro64 20:36, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
The editor hasn't edited since November and I honestly don't think this should have been submitted to GAN in its current state. I'm failing this nomination. GamerPro64 16:04, 13 December 2016 (UTC)