Morph (song) was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
"from their fifth studio album" → "from their fifth studio album,"
"It was written by" → "The song was written by"
"The track was produced by Joseph alongside Paul Meany of Mutemath and" → "It was produced by Joseph, with co-production from Paul Meany of Mutemath, and"
""Morph" was one of the less conceptual parts" → "the song is one of the less conceptual parts" for correct tense, as the album exists in the present
"it still revealed more" → "it still reveals more"
"city called "DEMA."" → "city called "DEMA"."
"comes in "Morph" with" → "comes in the song with"
The second para should begin with the genre sentence followed by other comp info, as this stuff belongs before lyrics
"as the band tries" → "as the duo tries"
"The duo incorporate" → "They incorporate"
"life into "Morph."" → "life into the song."
"on how Tyler Joseph will" → "on how Joseph will"
"moving forward and continue" → "moving forward, and continue"
"so he doesn't wallow in" → "to prevent him wallowing in" to avoid repetitive wording
Why is lounge jazz mentioned as a genre here when elsewhere, lounge and jazz are listed as two genres?
""Morph" managed to achieve" → "The song managed to achieve" but the part about no single release should be removed, as this is a 2018 release and it had already become common for non-singles to chart by then
"R&B on "Morph."" → "R&B on "Morph"." with the pipe
"production assisted by Paul Meany of Mutemath." → "production, assisted by Meany."
"with much of the record" → "with much of the album"
"scattering things such as Tyler Joseph's" → "scattering content such as Joseph's"
"The track was equipped with falsetto R&B" → "The track is equipped with R&B" because you shouldn't give the full info here to avoid repetition
"also deployed accelerated" → "also deploys accelerated" but bare in mind, I have not requested tense change for ones that are from sources detailing the recording specifically (the other info belongs here, but it is still about the song in its existent state)
"demonstrating how much of a virtuoso percussionist Dun had become." → "demonstrating Dun as a virtuoso percussionist." with the pipe
"moving forward and continue" → "moving forward, and continue" but the problem is that this is full on repeated from earlier; shouldn't you crop the part in the other section to avoid overly repeating things?
"can truly "hear."" → "can truly "hear"." per MOS:QUOTE
On hold until all of the issues are fixed; good job with the broadness but you need to fix mostly repetition and the ref layout! --K. Peake20:16, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
EthanRossie2000 Nice job working on this so far, but you should have left a comment to notify me since I had no idea until checking the article days after the review – you still need to implement the fixes for charts and refs, however. --K. Peake10:52, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am sadly going to have to ✗ Fail this article since despite it being onhold for so long and the user having continuous prompts, they have still yet to work on the charts and references issues properly. I know it's only two sections, but it's bigger than it seems in areas like the Plugged In ref that is invoked more than five times. However, if the issues are fixed and this is re-nominated, I will probably take it back up! --K. Peake06:06, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]