Jump to content

Talk:Morgenthau Report

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fact tag defacement of the article

[edit]

After I added some reliably sourced material, Piotrus came into the article and bombed it with 16 fact tags, effectively defacing it. Piotrus has a habit of following me around and challeging my edits, based not on the quality of the edits but apparently on some form of animosity. That's not reason to deface and article and make it difficult to read. I've noted the tags and will address them soon. All of the info added is sourced to the refs I added at the end of paragraphs. Boodlesthecat Meow? 01:09, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kapiszewski article

[edit]

Andrzej Kapiszewski, Controversial Reports on the Situation of the Jews in Poland in the Aftermath of World War Studia Judaica 7: 2004 nr 2(14) s. 257-304

On page 270: [1]

Gibson reported also that Piłsudski told him that the troops newly arrived from France, that is General Haller’s army, composed to large extent of volunteer Polish-Americans, “had shown a disposition to make life miserable for the Jews, chasing them through the streets, cutting off their beards et cetera.”

Following this meeting, Gibson informed Washington about events in Warsaw on June 26, in which some soldiers from Haller’s army beat a number of Jews.50 Gibson reported that the Polish Minister of War issued a special order condemning the incident, warning the soldiers that “any violation of civil rights is a crime to be punished with full severity of law,” and that they were “obliged while off duty or on duty to aid the oppressed.” Nevertheless, the Minister believed that inter-group tensions were caused “by the enemy agents paid to provoke them”.

Please do not remove referenced information.Faustian (talk) 06:09, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The question is whether or not this appears in the Morgenthau report (it might, I have no idea), or is it a WP:SYNTH. Volunteer Marek  08:21, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed information which was NOT referenced. There is no mention of the Blue Army in the Morgenthau Report as printed in the January 19, 1920 NY Times article. http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9904E5DF103AE033A2575AC1A9679C946195D6CF How can one include information in an article when that information was never in the Subject of the article? Where is the reference to the Blue Army in the Morgenthau Report? I was told that Wikipedia strives for accuracy and verifiability, over truth. Cite me the accurate reference to the Blue Army in the Morgenthau report, as it was published in the public newspapers, not from subsequent articles written by other people. Also, what happened to the edit button on this article? Hallersarmy (talk) 04:40, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Morgenthau Report. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:32, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]