Jump to content

Talk:Morgan Hebard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Italics

[edit]

Perrydigm, Should the genera terms be italicized?–CaroleHenson (talk) 12:40, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Citation formatting and page citing

[edit]

This text was in the article, but there needs to be some work on the citations and it will be easier to explain here:

In 1916, he erected both the Genera Symploce[1] and Xestoblatta [2], and in 1929 he described several new genera of Malayan Blattidae on a scientific base including the genera Shelfordina [3], Malaccina, Graptoblatta and Hebardula.[4]
Extraneous citations:[5]

[6][7][8][9]

References

  1. ^ Che Y; Wang Z (2013). "Three new species of cockroach genus Symploce Hebard, 1916 (Blattodea, Ectobiidae, Blattellinae) with redescriptions of two known species based on types from Mainland China". ZooKeys (337): 1–18.
  2. ^ Silva-da-Silva, L. R.; Lopes, S. M. (2015). "Two new species of Xestoblatta Hebard, 1916 from Brazil, a redescription of Xestoblatta roppai Rocha e Silva Albuquerque & Fraga, 1975 and a key for the species of the buscki group (Blattodea, Ectobiidae, Blattellinae)". ZooKeys (526): 117–129.
  3. ^ Wang, Zong􀀁Qing; Che Yan􀀁Li; Zhang,Yan􀀁Ning (2009). "Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica". 34 (3): 443–445. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  4. ^ Hebard, M. (1929). "Studies in Malayan Blattidae (Orthoptera)". Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Science. 81: 1–109.
  5. ^ C. F. A. Bruijning (1948). Studies on Malayan Blattidae. Leiden: Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie. p. 1. Retrieved May 12, 2017.
  6. ^ Hebard, M. (1916). "A new genus, Cariblatta, of the Group Blattellites (Orthoptera, Blattidae)". Trans. Am. Ent. Soc. 42: 147–186. pis. XI-XIII.
  7. ^ Hebard, 1922. The Dermaptera and Orthoptera of Hawaii. Occ. Pap. Bishop Mus. Honolulu, vol. 7, no. 14, pp. 305-379, pis. XXVI-XXVII.
  8. ^ Hebard, 1929. Studies in Malayan Blattidae (Orthoptera). Proc Acad. nat. Sci. Philad., vol. 81, pp. 1-109, pis. 1-6.
  9. ^ Hebard, 1940. A New Generic Name to Replace Sigmoidella Hebard, Not of Cushman and Ozana (Orthoptera: Blattidae). Entomological News, vol. 51, p. 236.
  • You just need to have the source for the information, not the footnotes from the subject of the article (a primary source).
  • The footnote, though, should cover the content from the secondary source and it doesn't look like page 1 covers the source.
  • The author names and titles don't need to be capitalized, as they are in a few cases, like "STUDIES ON MALAYAN BLATTIDAE".–CaroleHenson (talk) 03:12, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely right. This passage was definitely a 'work in progress' and did not belong on the finished page. Thank you for setting up this "talk" page. As an almost total newbie, it often takes me a few passes to get formatting and citations sorted properly and going straight to the completed page was an act of premature confidence that I would eventually work out the glitches. I really do appreciate your help in working this stuff out. Perrydigm (talk) 21:42, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Have a citation for this?

[edit]

"Species were also named in his honor by others including Hebardia Pellucida."

CaroleHenson (talk) 03:16, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're absolutely right about these issues. I was used to using the page as a 'work in progress' and was effectively making notes to myself for later follow-up and hadn't converted to the higher standards due for a functioning page... This is a much better way to address the multiple issues. Thanks for setting it up, and thanks again for ALL the help with this page/process

Perrydigm (talk) 21:31, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's my pleasure.–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:52, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]