Talk:Morfa Bychan

Merger proposal

There is very little information on this page, and little else, other than a few adverts, anywhere on the web about Morfa Bychan. The nearby village of Borth-y-Gest, on which there is a far more information than Morfa Bychan, is included in Porthmadog, the community of which both villages form part. It seems logical to treat Morfa Bychan the same way. The other village in the community, Tremadog is a different matter. That article contains a wealth of information and is justified in its own right. Morfa Bychan would, of course be a redirect to Porthmadog, so anyone searching for Morfa Bychan would still reach what little information there is. Skinsmoke (talk) 20:38, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm personally in favour of keeping them separate - they are not the same place, just nearby. I guess I'm a bit inclusionist, but the MB article seems to have some cites, so leave it. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:52, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it has one citation. And I put that one in. I've found it impossible to verify almost anything else on the page.Skinsmoke (talk) 01:19, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

strongly oppose merge - separate places, separate article. Jeni ^(talk)_(Jenuk1985) 17:30, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose the merge it is a separate village and should not be merged with Porthmadog. DanielR235 19:44, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Re-write

I have re-wrote this article and would like to add a picture, I have one but am not sure how to upload it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DanielR235 (talk • contribs) 19:46, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Morfa Bychan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:36, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]