Talk:More to Love

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the More to Love article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

--216.15.54.81 (talk) 18:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should base the age, weight etc., based on what is broadcast on the show and not any other sources. Obviously the contestants age and weight will change but what is important is what it was at the time of filming.--216.15.54.81 (talk) 10:40, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should limit the table to only the information FOX provides (age, height, weight, and occupation). It should all be relevant to filming, not where they are now. BMI should not be included for two reasons. The first is that it is not given by FOX. The second reason is that BMI is widely criticized, which is probably why FOX doesn't show it, and it's also why we shouldn't use it. I'm also not sure how it's relevant. Weight and height are, given the premise of the show, but BMI is a totally medical thing, which has no bearing on the show. --13² 15:07, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I admit I just wanted to get an easy comparison across people of different heights, but I can see the argument that it isn't quite encylopedic enough. --216.15.54.81 (talk) 18:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the link to the show's Hulu page was convenient and encyclopedic (I checked the guidelines and they did not seem to explicitly forbid such links). However if a human editor thinks it is inappropriate then I will remove the link. --216.15.54.81 (talk) 11:00, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Hulu link needs to be removed per WP:EL #8. Also, video links should generally be avoided. We're not here to provide people with a way to watch the show; we're here to provide the facts about the show (which, by the way, we need more info on production and reception). Further, while it doesn't appear on the main site yet, these videos are probably going to pop up on FOX's full episode list soon, which can be found in the link we already have. --13² 15:07, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I don't have super strong feelings about it, I just thought of it as a convenience, but I can see your argument that that is not wikipedia's purpose. --216.15.54.81 (talk) 18:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This page is going to be bombarded (and currently is) by people following the link from The Phillip De Franco Show on youtube. Jkdeadite (talk) 21:42, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Yes it is I hope they will stop before they need to make this semi protected. Going to wait a hour and come back to see what happens.... Battlecity0 ([[User talk:Battlecity0|talk]]) 21:44, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't copy/paste an old version. You added like 3000 characters that weren't necessary. Instead, find an older version in the history, go to edit that version, and then save it without making changes. It's faster, plus it'll be more accurate and you're less likely to accidentally get stealth vandalism mixed in. --13² 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]