Talk:Morchella tridentina
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Morchella tridentina article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Morchella tridentina has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 16, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shouldn't this article be migrated to Morchella tridentina
[edit]Morchella frustrata is a synonym for Morchella tridentina. Shouldn't this article be reworked (reworded) and moved to Morchella tridentina? I can see this is not trivial undertaking and having a section explaining the relatively recent reclassification would be important.User-duck (talk) 03:00, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- Someone else renamed the article. I have reworked it and tried to resolve the inconsistencies of renaming to M. tridentina. Also I rearranged the sections a bit and made many small changes. I have left the article as a good article for the time being - I don't know what to do about that. Strobilomyces (talk) 10:54, 19 May 2020 (UTC)