Talk:Moral entrepreneur

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Moral entrepreneur redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect has been marked as needing immediate attention.

how does a moral entrepreneur affect the scare created about crack?

It should read ‘pro and anti-LGBT groups’, otherwise this item seems to lack neutrality.

Another books which can be used as a source

See, [1], it analyses moral entrepreneurs.--RekishiEJ (talk) 20:58, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POV

Throughout much of this article, sociological theories that seem somewhat tendentious are presented as facts. A re-write making it clear that the content expresses the view of a specific school of thought would be a great improvement. Nikolaj1905 (talk) 13:38, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Massive issues with neutrality

Trying to assign mothers drunk driving and others as manipulative demagogue status is beyond ridiculous. This entire article needs to be cleaned out even deleted and start over fresh 2601:1C0:CC01:3C0:219A:92B0:5E76:9FFF (talk) 11:34, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn’t refer to them as ‘manipulative demogogues’, where did that come from? It has a neutral definition of the term. 2607:FEA8:9281:1430:9C4:8B82:3DE4:40FF (talk) 04:16, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]