Jump to content

Talk:Moral and National Education controversy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Updates

[edit]

This article needs to be updated as the Government backed down over the subject and declared the original curriculum guide invalid in September 2012. It is now (according to the government) up to schools' discretion to open classes for "National Education".

As the creator of this article (claiming no ownership), I feel ashamed to hesitate to update it myself. But I decided it is best for me to stay away from editting it. At 13:51 on 29 July 2012‎ I created this framework of article and planned to add details of the curriculum itself and the arguments surrounding it. 4 minutes after the creation, User:Basalisk removed a paragraph from the article unilaterally and against the policies, and threatened to ban me from editting. I did not surrender to his threat and reported his act to an admin noticeboard, and then User:Dennis Brown speedy deleted it without anyone having tagged it for SD. At a deletion review, the admin "[stood] corrected" but refused to either apologise or overturn the deletion. Fortunately for Wikipedia, a clear-minded admin restored the article under my namespace, and another user later moved it back to article space. Much to my disappointment, Basalisk is now an admin. As someone pointed out at the DR, someone's passed their RfA then they can do exactly whatever they please forever afterwards. I do not edit the article to avoid Basalisk, who has larger power now, targetting it again, but I am happy to exchange my ideas about this article on talk page. I am convinced the article in its present form can survive AfD if everyone acts in accordance with Wikipedia policies.

Recently, the Parents' Concern Group and James Hon Lin-shan (one of the hunger strike participants) have published books telling their stories during the week-long protest outside the Goverment Headquarters. The 2 books, «爸爸媽媽上戰場» by the PCG and «絕食廣場日記» by Hon, can be sources for further updates. Of course, HK government's and communists' perpective should be mentioned with equal weight. Although this article covers more on a social movement than a curriculum, it is advisable to update how the now non-compulsory MNE will be implemented.--Jabo-er (talk) 03:49, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Moral and national education. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Moral_and_National_Education_controversy&oldid=1209166614"