Talk:Moorside railway station (Cumbria)

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Trains: Stations / in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Proposed railway station

How can a proposed railway station have definitive coordinates when the location is for a proposed Moorside Nuclear Power Station, which is being fought by neighbors? Perhaps I should pick a spot on the railway west of the proposed nuclear power station. Any advice from editors in Cumbria?--Dthomsen8 (talk) 00:02, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Dthomsen8: This page has only three watchers (myself included). If it's a firm proposal, a planning application will have been deposited with the local authority (Copeland Borough Council); in that, there will be detailed plans showing not just the location but the layout and form of the platforms, buildings and other structures; there will therefore be coordinates. If however it is merely the subject of a consultation or feasibility study, there will be no definite location and really we should look at getting this article deleted as failing WP:CRYSTAL. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:59, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Moorside railway station (Cumbria). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150610173832/http://www.nugenconsultation.com/media/1104/the-consulation-document.pdf to http://www.nugenconsultation.com/media/1104/the-consulation-document.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:08, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]