Talk:Moondog (1969 album)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: DadOfTheYear2022 (talk · contribs) 16:49, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
'GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Hello, I'm reviewing this article. All neutrals are currently placeholders, and will be changed once I work on it. DadOfTheYear2022 (talk) 16:49, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Disregard the below comment, I believe that it's properly tagged. Article is good in my eyes.DadOfTheYear2022 (talk) 18:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Initial Comments
[edit]- I am unfamiliar with the sourcing for images, so the image of the trimba prevents my approval on that part. Otherwise, this looks good. DadOfTheYear2022 (talk) 17:18, 15 April 2022 (UTC)