Talk:Monty Oxymoron

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Real name.

Think his real name, whatever that is, has a place in this article. Peteinterpol (talk) 21:25, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use of subject's website

User:Halumian has removed inline citations from the subject's website, that indicate the source of the information shown. So readers can see the information, but have no way of judging the reliability of it. So we are getting the worst of both worlds.

WP guidance WP:RS, advises:

"Wikipedia articles are required to present a neutral point of view. However, reliable sources are not required to be neutral, unbiased, or objective."

Would be interested in other editors' views on this but I cannot see the value of excluding where the material has come from. I propose that we include citations on this page to show where the information has come from. Peteinterpol (talk) 10:13, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All of the links were to the same exact webpage which seems highly useless (aside from one other link that was broken). I both agree and disagree about the value of adding these repeatedly throughout this article. I can see why having sources is important obviously, but having the same exact source that is just a homepage, repeated over and over again just seems rather pointless. As I don't think this artist page should even exist with this little information, nothing verifiable outside of what the artist says, I'll acquiesce and not change it back should you revert.

Halumian (talk) 13:20, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Halumian, I do believe that the page should be reverted to its previous content. Peteinterpol (talk) 19:19, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Monty Oxymoron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140113162154/http://www.damned12.freeserve.co.uk/monty2_int.htm to http://www.damned12.freeserve.co.uk/monty2_int.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:20, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]