Talk:Montreal/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GAreview.Pyrotec (talk) 21:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

GA review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

A comprehensive, wide-ranging, well-illustrated, article.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   There are a number of "red-links" in the article, perhaps a few too many; however they do not detract from the overall standard of the article, which is compliant with GA-class.Pyrotec (talk) 20:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations on the article, I'm awarding GA-status.Pyrotec (talk) 20:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your review! MTLskyline (talk) 22:26, 1 April 2009 (UTC)