Jump to content

Talk:Montreal–Philippines cutlery controversy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

POV tag

[edit]

This article is written from the left-liberal allege-racism-on-every-pretext-you-can point of view. It needs some balance. Haddiscoe 18:16, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The only allegation that it actually makes is in the second paragraph... which shouldn't be too hard to revise. 68.39.174.238 20:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What's POV about "Some commentators saw it as a regrettable example..."?
That's not an expression of POV, but rather an objective description of reaction to the incident. The notable aspect of this article is not the incident itself, but the reaction that occurred. --orlady 20:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Food Utensils category

[edit]

Not sure this is very related to food utensils, all the other articles are related to actual utensils. Remove it? 69.159.120.100 16:20, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be kept. The subcategories in Category:Food utensils lead to articles like Fork etiquette, which seem relevant to this article. FWIW, after reading your note I added this article to Category:Eating behaviors and added a "see also" link to Table manners. --orlady 19:10, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

[edit]

I have assessed this as Start Class, as it contains more detail and organization than would be expected of a Stub, and of low importance, as it a highly specific incident within Canada. Cheers, CP 15:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I have thrown out the following links:

The first is an outrageously expensive pay-per-view, the others are defunct. 88.77.188.152 (talk) 19:37, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Links ofen go dead simply because the URL has changed. I searched for the titles and found new links for two of those.   Will Beback  talk  19:53, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Manila based"

[edit]

What is this supposed to mean ? Is he an immigrant to Canada ? A tourist ? An exchange student ? To say he is "Manila based", it is very hard to make a sensible interpretation of this using the normal English language meaning of that phrase.Eregli bob (talk) 16:16, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I removed that locution, along with some other recent changes. --Orlady (talk) 17:10, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Montreal–Philippines cutlery controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:29, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Montreal–Philippines_cutlery_controversy&oldid=1209151849"