Talk:Montpelier Hill/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 10:32, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 10:32, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Initial comments
[edit]I'm sorry of the apparent lack of progress on this review, I'm not sure where the time went.
I've completed a couple of quick read-throughs of the article and it appears, generally, to be at or about GA-level, so I will not be "quick failing" this nomination.
I'm now doing to carryout a more detailed review, working my way through the article section by section, but leaving the WP:Lead until last. At this point, I will mostly be concentrating on "problems", if any. So if I don't find too many this part of the review will be quite "thin". I hope to have this completed in the next 24 hours or so (perhaps 36 hours, we will see). Pyrotec (talk) 22:30, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- History -
- The Hell Fire Club -
- This subsection looks OK.
...to be continued. Pyrotec (talk) 22:49, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Prehistoric monuments , The Stewards House , Killakee (Lord Massy's) Estate , Carthy’s Castle & Orlagh House -
- These four subsections look OK.
- Access and recreation & WP:Lead -
- I'm happy with these. Pyrotec (talk) 19:44, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Overall summary
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A comprehensive, well-rferenced, well-illustrated article
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Well referenced.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Well referenced.
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Well illustrated.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Well illustrated.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations on producing an interesting and informative article. Pyrotec (talk) 20:04, 4 March 2011 (UTC)