Jump to content

Talk:Monsters University/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 13:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead
  • Move "Monsters University tells the story of Mike and Sulley studying at college. They first started off as rivals, but slowly became best friends." further up lead nearer top.
 Done: Also, Fru1tbat tweaked the lead a bit
  • Should probably mention something about production and the soundtrack
 Done
Plot
  • What is a "scarer"? place in brackets for anybody not familiar with the series of films
 Done by Fru1tbat
Production
  • "On April 5, 2011, it was announced that the film's release date would be June 21, 2013. It was the studio's fourteenth feature film." merge and reword as "The studio's fourteenth feature film, on April 5, 2011 it was announced that the film would be released on June 21, 2013.
 Done: Again, tweaked by Fru1tbat
Release
  • Move section to below Soundtrack.
 Done
Reviews

A lot of reviews, some of them are a bit too generic and redundant, when I write a review section I try to pick quotes which add further information about themes and split rather than simply "I liked it" sort of thing. It should be OK for GA though but bear it in mind.

 Done: Splited positive reviews and negative reviews. Also, deleted few reviews. There were way too many.
Refs
  • Ensure that all date formatting is consistent no 2013-06, ideally write as 24 June 2013. Sources in the 30s and 56 in particular.
 Done
  • Fix ref 71, broken.
 Done

All points done, thank you.--Jionpedia 15:40, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Looks OK to me now. Thanks and all the best!♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:49, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A very big thank you!--Jionpedia 15:51, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]