This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
There is a great website up now (monroeworktoday.org) that has a lot of biographical information about Monroe Work, as well as his research and historical record keeping at Tuskegee Institute. I don't imagine I'll have time in the next month to dig into this and leverage this presentation of history, but I'm hoping this message will be enough to inspire someone else to lead the charge. -- RobLa (talk) 22:04, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The word "Negro" is in the article thirty six times. Not out of puritanism or political correctness but on the basis purely of text quality, this repetition seems to me to be quite excessive. The main culprit is the subject's bibliography list. (See also comments by DutchTreat from some eleven years ago!) Perhaps someone could find a better way to list the books. -The Gnome (talk) 13:28, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@The Gnome: I agree there was room for improvement. I gave it a try by creating list of annual editions with links to the original works. Trying to be accurate without being repetitious. - DutchTreat (talk) 11:45, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]