Talk:Monospecificity
 | This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • Monotypic taxon Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Monotypic taxon |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Merger Proposal
[edit]I think Monotypic taxon and Monospecificity can be combined. The latter is just a single case of the former. Both articles are short. It also is hard to link to both in an article without it seeming clunky. Nessie (talk) 15:31, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- I guess so. Took me a while to find that one source explicitly stating that monospecificity is one species in a genus. If that's kept, then sure go ahead. The new title should be "Monotypic taxon", i.e. monospecificity merged into monotypic taxon – I'm assuming that's what you proposed. SpikeballUnion (talk) 16:14, 17 August 2017 (UTC)