Talk:Monkey World

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dorset Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dorset, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics connected with Dorset. If you would like to participate, you can visit the WikiProject Dorset project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.DorsetWikipedia:WikiProject DorsetTemplate:WikiProject DorsetDorset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Zoo

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Zoo, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to zoos, aquaria, and aviaries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ZooWikipedia:WikiProject ZooTemplate:WikiProject ZooZoo articles

Questions to be answered

I have hunted around the internet and I cannot find the interesting details of how this center grew from 2 acres to 65 arces. Was the first 2 acre sanctuary totally self funded by Jim? What about the 65acre current sanctuary? Was it totally funded by Jim (a zoo worker)?... somehow this seems improbable, so who funded this? was the land donated? was it afforded just by the admission ticket sales? I hope someone can flesh out the details, it would be interesting to know how he did this and what foundations or individuals were involved in the growth of the facility. I think other sanctuaries or potential sanctuaries might find this information to be useful or inspirational. So if you know some details please help provide them. Thanks. -- Unsigned

There are 2 Monkey Business special episodes airing on itv1 in June 2008 covering the history of Monkey World. -- dudegalea (talk) 07:31, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hengatie's View

This is a really good zoo. I recently went there and had a really good time. Hengatie 07:48, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to questions to be asked

I think jim funded this whole mainly on his own as it was his dream to start it

at the beggening there was only about 15 chimps so i wasnt that much money. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tigerlemurguy (talk • contribs) 15:58, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Monkeybusinessdvds.jpg

Image:Monkeybusinessdvds.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:09, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

gloria

gloria loves yall —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.140.235.49 (talk) 19:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Friends of Monkey World

I have a site called Friends of Monkey World. I think it'd break wiki etiquette for me to add it to the page myself, as it is my site. So I'll just leave this note here, and if anyone else thinks that it is suitable for linking from the article, they can go ahead and add it. --dudegalea (talk) 07:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Original research and COI

The article appears to be frequently edited by one or more persons connected to Monkey World. Although these edits are likely made in good faith, editing articles with a subject you are connected to in some way is strongly discouraged – see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. These edits are also unsourced which would suggest original research: "Wikipedia does not publish original research or original thought. All material added to articles must be attributable to a reliable published source". Barret (talk) 17:42, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The following document looks like it would be a good source of independent reference material

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dorset/content/articles/2007/04/05/monkey_world_feature.shtml

Back ache (talk) 10:10, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Monkey World. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927132536/http://www.monkeyworld.co.uk/press.php?ArticleID=128 to http://www.monkeyworld.co.uk/press.php?ArticleID=128

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:25, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are Additional citations still needed

The additional citation template was showing from 2009 and yet there have been many additions. Shouldn't this template be removed now? 212.159.5.89 (talk) 12:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]