Talk:Monis v The Queen

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Law Low‑importance

	Australia portal Monis v The Queen is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because although some of the content is taken from an external source, this content is available under a free, CC BY-SA 3.0-compatible license. --Orthogonal1 (talk) 20:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've talked with the AHRC and they believe that this is their work, but they're double checking. However I also note that it looks like it was taken from here (web archived version), where it's clearly marked as the Commission's own work. I would, however, recommend that Orthogonal1 replace the footnotes with links to the specific sources in question since they're linked to on the AHRC's website but not on the Wikipedia article, so this could be confusing to anyone looking for footnote sourcing. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:38, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]