Jump to content

Talk:Monica Reyes/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 19:10, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will begin review tomorrow.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:10, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Can you mention the first and last episode she appeared in?

Conceptual history
  • "The character was considered to be like Mulder in her optimism". According to whom?
  • "having a nature that could be considered lighter, sunnier, brighter, warmer and more overtly sexy." Again who considers this?

"The ninth season episode "Hellbound", in which Reyes discovers that she was apparently reincarnated, began as an effort to give Reyes or Doggett a drive, as they were seen, by at least some writers, as the successors to Mulder and Scully.", what do you mean give a drive? to develop their character relationships?

Character arc
  • Delink the names already linked.
Reception==


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Based on John Doggett looks to meet requirements, although it would be nice to see more information about production and character development. Also I think the lead could be expanded a bit to summarise the whole article a bit better.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:42, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]