This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Aoba47 – just out of curiousity, how did you access these sources? My ProQuest account is temporarily unavailable to me since I am in between undergraduate and graduate school, and my account was university-affiliated. Carbrera (talk) 17:53, 10 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]
I actually do not have access to the full sources. I found them through a Google Scholar so I cannot be absolutely certain if they would be helpful for this article. I used to have access to these journals through my undergraduate and graduate schools, but I had lost both privileges since graduation. I am a lifetime alumni member for my undergraduate school, but I can only access the journals while on the campus (and that is not really possible given the current state of the pandemic and the fact that I live about an hour and a half away). I would recommend asking for the sources at the Resource Request. I hope this clears that up. Aoba47 (talk) 18:37, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
Reviewing this for the GAN backlog; the first time I reviewed one of your articles during this period though! --K. Peake20:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The non-fiction and second season parts are not sourced in the Amazon introduction
"and create a song out of it." → "to create "Money Can't Buy You Class" out of it." since the source shows her mentioning the song itself
I'd prefer the wording "and create a song, ultimately recording 'Money Can't Buy You Class'" as I feel the other way suggests the final title was pre-established, which the source does not state. Carbrera (talk) 22:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]
"as an exclusive on" → "as a streaming exclusive via" to avoid overusing "on", with the target
"on May 25 the next month, when it was released" → "on May 25, being released" since everyone knows May comes directly after April
Add a comma before through
[8] is useless, as [7] backs up the release in various countries including the US
Are you sure "success" is the correct term or maybe something like "exposure" would work better, as the song was not really successful?
"he receives a" → "he was receiving a"
"created the remix for de Lesseps," → "worked on the remix with de Lesseps," per the source
The most perfect terrible song part is not sourced; you could add the "it just came out perfect, working on this collab with the one and only Countess was awesome" part though
"It was released to digital retailers" → "The remix was released to digital retailers in various countries"
Kyle Peake – thank you for the review, as always. I believe I have addressed all of your concerns. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do. Thanks again, Carbrera (talk) 22:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Carbrera Mostly looks good, but why is the James Kennedy remix listed as released in 2018 when none of the Apple Music sources lead to the remix or back up the date? --K. Peake07:05, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
On hold until all of the issues are fixed, but this article is reasonably well-written. --K. Peake 11:38, 7 March 2021 (UTC)