Jump to content

Talk:Moments (One Direction song)/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reassessor: Till (talk · contribs)

How this was passed as a Good article is something beyond me.

Issues

[edit]
  • Infobox—source for songwriter is not needed.
  • Lead—the article is too short to contain 2 paragraphs for the lead.
  • taken from the deluxe edition of their debut studio album Up All Night. --> Year?
  • The song received positive reviews from music critics, praising the song's memorability and compositional structure. --> Past tense to present?
  • Background—In an interview, Sheeran talking about the song, stated, --> Huh? This doesn't make sense. And anyways, what interview?
  • Composition and critical reception—these two sections don't go well together.
  • According to the sheet music published by EMI Music Publishing --> Unnecessary
  • Written in the key of D major; vocal elements range from the note of D4 to A5. --> Awkward prose
  • "Moments" is a pop ballad --> Should be stated earlier in the article
  • What the f*ck makes the 'Sugarscape' and 'Pop & Glory' sources reliable?
  • Charts—add 'sortable'
  • Two pictures is a little much for such a short article.
  • References—every 'work' paramater that isn't a printed source should not be in italics. There's some over-linking going on (e.g. Allmusic, Rovi)
  • This hardly feels like a GA. It's so short.

Overall

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Till 08:03, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I notified the main contributer to the article 10 days ago and they have made no effort to address the issues. As such, I am delisting this as a GA. The article can be renominated any time but I would suggest that the above remaining issues are fixed. Till 00:33, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.